Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 264 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Version 42 Beta Available #54958

    parasti
    Participant

    Nacho, had you posted in just one place and simply read the replies rather than spamming all over, you’d probably see my reply to you, where I explain how to do it.

    Edit: I didn’t realise that this wasn’t a new post asking the same thing but one of the two posted a few days ago (one of which I replied to), so I have to apologise for the harsh tone of this comment. For what it’s worth, the info you’re looking for is and was available in my original reply. Thanks to bazzz for bringing this to my attention.

    in reply to: Version 42 Released #55101

    parasti
    Participant

    @nacho wrote:

    i can’t make it work because i have got ubuntu 8.10
    can you help me?

    Either compile from source or use “alien” to convert the RPM to a DEB, which you can then install with “dpkg -i”.

    in reply to: Version 42 Released #55096

    parasti
    Participant

    Here’s what someone had to say on IRC about the release:

    12:57 The .tar.gz for download at sourceforge.
    12:57 It is not a .tar.gz
    12:57 Is it an uncompressed tar
    12:58 Scorched3D-42-src.tar.gz is not compressed.
    12:58 Since it has a .tar.gz ending on it and is not compressed that causes an unexpected
    problem for my download scripts.
    12:59 Thanks for providing Scorched3D
    12:59 I appreciate it.
    12:59 🙂

    I haven’t had a chance to download it myself, but the size of the tarball given on the download page is suspicious.

    in reply to: A few patches against SVN #54631

    parasti
    Participant

    Glad to read that. As for the GCC 4.3 patch, I’m not particularly confident that I did it the right way, but it only adds a few headers (so no harm done if I messed up somewhere) and the game does fail to compile without it. But I’m sure distro packagers will take care of it even if you decide to hold off until after the release.

    in reply to: A few patches against SVN #54628

    parasti
    Participant

    I see the sort-by-price patch has been committed to the repo. I’ve updated the top post accordingly. Thanks!

    in reply to: A few patches against SVN #54627

    parasti
    Participant

    @gcamp wrote:

    Thanks Dude looks like some good work, I’ll add it to the repository when I get into work tomorrow (my memory allowing 🙂 ).

    That’s great. I’ll let you know when it starts to feel like nothing is happening.

    in reply to: A few patches against SVN #54623

    parasti
    Participant

    @thrax wrote:

    It shouldn’t be too much trouble for him to pop this into the source in progress.

    Yeah, that’s actually why I used the SVN code rather than 41.3. I honestly don’t expect anybody to commit the unmodified patch to the repo in a heartbeat, but I hope it’s enough to at least get the ball rolling, one way or another.

    in reply to: WISH U ALL VERY HAPPY NEW YEAR #54794

    parasti
    Participant

    Laimīgu jauno gadu!

    in reply to: Pom playing guitar hero!! #54655

    parasti
    Participant

    @irishbandit wrote:

    I wish i played the guitar that good.

    So does the guy who made the video, I bet.

    in reply to: xox banned #54642

    parasti
    Participant

    I am banned.
    You are banned.
    He is banned.
    She is banned.
    It is banned.

    We are banned.
    They are banned.

    Merry Christmas to you too, Apache. 😉

    in reply to: Rommel was banned? #54577

    parasti
    Participant

    Thanks, Acid. That’s a good enough answer to me.

    in reply to: Rommel was banned? #54575

    parasti
    Participant

    @bigbear wrote:

    I used to advocate this when I was admin I guess, so I feel partially responsible for the current situation where every last little admin action is discussed in public. To be honest though, it is starting to look more and more like a mistake to me.

    Considering I started the topic, I can’t help but feel all this rhetoric is targeted at me. I didn’t set out to “discuss every last little admin action in public” and I hope you’re not implying that the title “admin” really does amount to “can ban people”, because that’s pretty much the only thing ever being “discussed in public”. I am allergic to abuse of authority, though. I mean, how difficult can it be to answer “why was X banned”? Why does somebody get banned and then unbanned in a matter of days? Why do you feel the need to rant about admin greatness or about undesirable public discussions? And why the hell do these ridiculous questions even occur to me when this is supposed to be an open community of an open-source project?

    in reply to: Rommel was banned? #54571

    parasti
    Participant

    @laptops Daddy wrote:

    god damn it! what do you expect from these people? the admins here are about the tamest, friendly and approachable, mild mannered authority figures ive ever come across.

    Are you talking to me? You’re not making a whole lot of sense, man. If admins were a bunch of randomly abusive assholes, I’m sure you would see a lot less of “whining”, but thankfully that’s not the case. Notice how I said “you”, because I sure as hell wouldn’t want to be a part of a community like that. That last sentence in the quote is very true, and that’s exactly why it bothers me when someone gets banned and it’s not clear why. I don’t even care if it was a mistake, just admit it, unban the poor guy and let’s all move on.

    rommel, i dont think you are unpopular. ive always thought of you as a likeable kind of guy. its refreshing to see someone ready to go to such lengths to stand up for what they believe in.

    I thoroughly enjoy playing against people who play the game in a sort of “non-conventional” manner, and Rommel is one of them. But I recognise the fact that many more people dislike him because of the same exact thing, which is where my “unpopular” claim comes from.

    in reply to: Rommel was banned? #54565

    parasti
    Participant

    @acid22 wrote:

    You still invite an argument with every post. This time by insinuating that I would lie anyway. I therefore ‘feel’ to not bother at the moment.

    Sorry? In order to tell the truth or lie, you actually have to say something; as far as I’m aware, you haven’t said anything at all. We’ve got Rommel’s side of the story, why don’t you share yours?

    in reply to: SCORCH’s Greatest Games #35647

    parasti
    Participant

    Here’s some evidence that six digits are still not enough! I had help from Naka, who selflessly gave away all his cash in round 9 to support my cause. Surprisingly, I also won that game, with nothing but baby missiles (and a ****load of cash). 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 264 total)