Forum Replies Created
Sorry to hear that, i have two dogs that are part of my family and losing a pet like that is always hard.
Strength and best wishes to you and you wife.
Yes indeed 😀
There are many sensible suggestions here. I agree with thrax proposal of the levels of game moderation. I think that would create a decent basis for things to run smooth.
There is also the forum moderation being discussed, something similar could work there too.As mentioned they are two different responsibilities and may need seperate discussions.
After we can come to a consensus on the game admin part may i suggest we start the forum moderator discussion in a different thread. Having discussions run trough one another will make it harder to follow and will only cause distraction.
Since thrax has come up with a complete structure for the game and there seem to be no oblections to the substance of it i would suggest we apply it. Does it need to be voted for would gavin decide if we will use it.Then the admins can be appointed and we can get to the next issue.
Unless we need more time to decide on this issue i would like for us to move ahead.
Great more old players, raden is here too!
Should create some interesting games, shooting rusty old players is much more fun than bots 😛
and be gentle when u see me in the current version… mwahahahaha
I hear some sarcasm but you seem to be asking something reasonable.
Assuming your nephew has some solid evidence and not just a personal grudge and paranoid traits wich causes him to see things that are not there he should contact the Admins who should be able to decide how to deal with this stuff, they are the authority.Of course it may just be possible that the admins are sympathetic to this offender and complaining may only work against himself.Or the admins are just unable to control theirselves let alone the forum, then its a tough deal.It would come down to fight or flight for him.
If something like this happened on this forum and i would have something to say about it it would be a serious offence and warrents action. Unfortunatly there are no rules agains it and if such a thing happened would only increase the divide since there is a history of admins publicly critisizing others claims of what the rules are.
For something like this to be solved correctly there should be a rule that covers such abuse, the admins should come to a consensus about the evidence and consequenses. Then the person would be contacted in private on what it is he is accused of and given the chance to defend himself. If he or she doesnt have a satisfactory explanation and the admins remain convinced of the charges and punishment it would be effectuated.
I hope this is a satisfactory answer to your nephew and you.As soon as the forum is unlocked i will respond there unless you are not fully convinced of the correctness of the content.
Regards and all the best to you,
Wise words indeed, Maybe we could show this everytime we try to post something. 😛
What is a sock puppet? Its either a sock over someones hand with googley eyes, or it is a fake double identity used online to deceive identities. You may be confused.
Or it has a different meaning, what in your head constitutes this sockpuppet.
Please care to explain, before i have to assume that you accuse me and rommel of being the same person.
So better be thorough in your explanation and choose your words carefully. I dont want to do a live show where rommel and i use socks over our hands to make sense of the term you use.
Yup a made up identity to deceive online communities.
Could you be more specific on what you mean?
No need for projection pom.
Thank you Gavin.
I would support any clear definition that would prevent excessive behaviour. I like the suggestion of limited levels of control, only those that earned their trust should be allowed to have great power, and if they misused their trust there should be consequenses.
Thrax suggestions seem all sensible to me, only the squeeky wheel shouldnt mean that we retroactive deny someone.If its forward looking yes i feel the same.Clean slates no past sentiments.
Thank you too Gavin for your sensible post. Whats not clear to me is how the forum moderation would be handled- Would all the server admins have the same editing power or will it have similar restrictions?
Rommel, please stop trying to reason in public at this point, i doubt that anyone will stick its neck out at this moment in time. If you are doing it to prove the point that there are irrational forces at work, thats been done.
If you choose to go ahead with arguing for better(any) rules i suggest you do it in private, i know its hard when people dont listen or simply dont respond.Its all part of the irrationality that plagues us.
If i am wrong and anyone wants to discuss the rules i may hope that there will be something constructive, for now i fear that its deja vu.
We dont need a repeat of steps, its getting boring.
Thank you chopper for understanding.
No reference is intentional, it would only distract from the reason in these posts.
Maybe seeing it together without the filter we look through will create some understanding for these sensible ideas.